Thought-Factory.net Philosophical Conversations Public Opinion philosophy.com Junk for code

Mandy Martin, Puritjarra 2, 2005. For further information on MANDY MARTIN, refer here: http://www.mandy-martin.com/
If there are diverse kinds of knowledge and ways of knowing place, then we need to learn to value the different ways each of us sees a single place that is significant, but differently so, for each perspective.
RECENT ENTRIES
SEARCH
ARCHIVES
Library
Thinkers/Critics/etc
WEBLOGS
Australian Weblogs
Critical commentary
Visual blogs
CULTURE
ART
PHOTOGRAPHY
DESIGN/STREET ART
ARCHITECTURE/CITY
Film
MUSIC
Sexuality
FOOD & WiNE
Other
www.thought-factory.net
looking for something firm in a world of chaotic flux

Film and digital technologies « Previous | |Next »
January 4, 2012

Levi Wedel, a Canadian photographer, runs an interesting post on digital and film photography on his Images Seen blog. I turned to it after seeing a second hand Hasselbald HD4D 40Film and digital technologies medium format digital camera system with a comprehensive set of lenses for $25,000.

There lies the future of photography I thought, when I held it in my hand, before putting it back. Wedel argues that film and digital technologies are not interchangeable terms when discussing photography even though both can produce an image. He says that Every medium is distinguished by a unique set of properties which in turn affects the meaning of work produced within that medium. Digital cameras are built to mimic the function and ergonomics of film camera.

Digital cameras simulate the results of photography but generate image information only and not physical photographic information. Digital sensors measure light and are not affected or altered in any way by light. The mimicry of film technologies by digital cameras is detrimental both to the progression of digital technologies and to the practice of photography in which film and other photographic technologies are at risk of becoming displaced and lost in favour of a technology incapable of performing the same function, a technology ultimately destined for other largely unexplored functions. Such unexplored functions are very interesting and it should in no way be taken as a negative that digital cameras are not a photography but rather something new.

The photograph is a physical artifact of a physical event, while the digital image is entirely abstract and semiotic at its core. Digital images are data-- sets of linguistic data whereas the film based image is a physical object-- a physical artifact of how light affected a bunch of silver.

| Posted by Gary Sauer-Thompson at 9:55 PM |