Thought-Factory.net Philosophical Conversations Public Opinion philosophy.com Junk for code

Mandy Martin, Puritjarra 2, 2005. For further information on MANDY MARTIN, refer here: http://www.mandy-martin.com/
If there are diverse kinds of knowledge and ways of knowing place, then we need to learn to value the different ways each of us sees a single place that is significant, but differently so, for each perspective.
RECENT ENTRIES
SEARCH
ARCHIVES
Library
Thinkers/Critics/etc
WEBLOGS
Australian Weblogs
Critical commentary
Visual blogs
CULTURE
ART
PHOTOGRAPHY
DESIGN/STREET ART
ARCHITECTURE/CITY
Film
MUSIC
Sexuality
FOOD & WiNE
Other
www.thought-factory.net
looking for something firm in a world of chaotic flux

Kevin O’Faircheallaigh's jeremiad against photography « Previous | |Next »
September 9, 2010

Here's another Susan Sontag inspired criticism of mass tourism and digital photography by Kevin O’Faircheallaigh that takes the form of "I hate mass photography".

says that loves Andreas Gursky and LaCahapelle O’Faircheallaigh, who writes for Crikey's travel blog, says that So I love photography in and of itself. This, however, is misleading. He is opposed to photography in itself.

I have however, never owned a camera. I’ve always felt that moments of visual beauty or happiness should be enjoyed, then allowed to become memory. I feel like while the photo may provide a more accurate record of something, it then takes over and the memory itself becomes what you see in the photo. I like the self adjusting function of the brain that lets you remember an experience as it felt, not just how it looked. Others will disagree, and I can’t deny the warm sense of nostalgia that you can get looking back over old photos. Overall though, I think photos lessen an experience rather than enhance it.

This is a familiar criticism and it is not linked to the art photography that O’Faircheallaigh judges to be worthwhile. So we are lefty with the familiar modernist duality of high and low, good and bad recycled by cultural conservatism to condemn the user generated work opened up by digital photography as documenting their holidays. Presumably, Gursky and LaCahapelle are not documenting.

Dan Miller, an Australian photographer, is the exception to O’Faircheallaigh's bad mass photography (half decent pictures) done with modern digital cameras. This suggests that those who buy expensive, top end digital camera are going beyond just recording their weekend full of happy slapping. They are, presumably, taking decent photographs.

| Posted by Gary Sauer-Thompson at 11:23 PM |